I blinked and I cured my brain. That’s how…
Can’t is the cancer of happen. Can’t is the cancer of happen.
I can’t do it.
The nike slogan doesn’t say “just try it” oh ok “just try it” no “just do it man”
but you love to party?
I mean, what’s not to love? Especially when you see how I party. It was epic. The run I was on made Sinatra, Flyn, Jagger, Richards, all of them just look like, you know, just droopy eyed armless children.
â€œThere is something to be learned from a rainstorm. When meeting with a sudden shower, you try not to get wet and run quickly along the road. But doing such things as passing under the eaves of houses, you still get wet. When you are resolved from the beginning, you will not be perplexed, though you still get the same soaking. This understanding extends to everything.â€
…a significant number of young men are faring rather badly in life, and are thus skewing the dating pool. It’s not that the overall gender ratio in this country is out of whack; it’s that there’s a growing imbalance between the number of successful young women and successful young men. As a result, in many of the places where young people typically meetâ€”on college campuses, in religious congregations, in cities that draw large numbers of twentysomethingsâ€”women outnumber men by significant margins. (In one Manhattan ZIP code, for example, women account for 63 percent of 22-year-olds.)
The idea that sex ratios alter sexual behavior is well-established. Analysis ofÂ demographic data from 117 countries has shown that when men outnumber women, women have the upper hand: Marriage rates rise and fewer children are born outside marriage. An oversupply of women, however, tends to lead to a more sexually permissive culture.
Michelle, a 20-year-old from Colorado, said she is in the same boat: “I had an ex-boyfriend of mine who said that, um, he didn’t know if he was ever going to get married because, he said, there’s always going to be someone better.”
And yet while young men’s failures in life are not penalizing them in the bedroom, their sexual success may, ironically, be hindering their drive to achieve in life. Don’t forget your Freud: Civilization is built on blocked, redirected, and channeled sexual impulse, because men will work for sex. Today’s young men, however, seldom have to.
I don’t question the game theory economics. I do find it sad. Keep the standards high ladies. For the good of the country. (via Shannon Buggs on FB)
“The whole new regulatory reform is a joke,” he said. ‘The whole government is a Ponzi scheme.” – Bernie Madoff
Some interesting excerpts, ones that I found interesting anyway, in Buffett’s 2011 annual letter. I read it every year and if you are interested in business you should too. I don’t own any Berkshire stock. I just like how Buffett thinks. All bold emphasis added by me.
On Railroads, Trucking and the Environment (for the PR curious, check Bernay’s work for Mack Trucks in 1949)
…railroads have major cost and environmentaladvantages over trucking, their main competitor. Last year BNSF moved each ton of freight it carried a record 500 miles on a single gallon of diesel fuel. Thatâ€™s three times more fuel-efficient than trucking is, which means our railroad owns an important advantage in operating costs. Concurrently, our country gains because of reduced greenhouse emissions and a much smaller need for imported oil. When traffic travels by rail, society benefits. (pg 3)
Rail moves 42% ofAmericaâ€™s inter-city freight, measured by ton-miles, and BNSF moves more than any other railroad â€“ about 28% of the industry total. A little math will tell you that more than 11% of all inter-city ton-miles of freight in the U.S. is transported by BNSF. Given the shift of population to the West, our share may well inch higher. (pg 14)
On being optimistic in the current economic environment:
No matter how serene today may be, tomorrow is always uncertain.
Donâ€™t let that reality spook you. Throughout my lifetime, politicians and pundits have constantly moaned about terrifying problems facing America. Yet our citizens now live an astonishing six times better than when I was born. The prophets of doom have overlooked the all-important factor that is certain: Human potential is far from exhausted, and the American system for unleashing that potential â€“ a system that has worked wonders for over two centuries despite frequent interruptions for recessions and even a Civil War â€“ remains alive and effective.
We are not natively smarter than we were when our country was founded nor do we work harder. But look around you and see a world beyond the dreams of any colonial citizen. Now, as in 1776, 1861, 1932 and1941, Americaâ€™s best days lie ahead. (pg 3-4)
On the folly of economic reporting periods to understand the value of a company:
Yearly figures, it should be noted, are neither to be ignored nor viewed as all-important. The pace of the earthâ€™s movement around the sun is not synchronized with the time required for either investment ideas or operating decisions to bear fruit. (pg 4)
On hiring well. Talent is the secret to business:
Our trust is in people rather than process. A â€œhire well, manage littleâ€ code suits both them and me. (pg 7)
On the mobile home industry (they own Clayton) and the government’s policies that relate to home ownership:
To explain: Home-financing policies of our government, expressed through the loans found acceptable by FHA, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, favor site-built homes and work to negate the price advantage that manufactured homes offer.We finance more manufactured-home buyers than any other company. Our experience, therefore, should be instructive to those parties preparing to overhaul our countryâ€™s home-loan practices. Letâ€™s take a look. Â [Net Losses as a Percentage of Average Loans in 2010 for Clayton was 1.72%]
Our borrowers get in trouble when they lose their jobs, have health problems, get divorced, etc. The recession has hit them hard. But they want to stay in their homes, and generally they borrowed sensible amounts in relation to their income. In addition, we were keeping the originated mortgages for our own account, which means we were not securitizing or otherwise reselling them. If we were stupid in our lending, we were going to pay the price. That concentrates the mind.
But a house can be a nightmare if the buyerâ€™s eyes are bigger than his wallet and if a lender â€“ often protected by a government guarantee â€“ facilitates his fantasy. Our countryâ€™s social goal should not be to put families into the house of their dreams, but rather to put them into a house they can afford. (pg 16-17)
On selecting talent:
One footnote: When we issued a press release about Toddâ€™s joining us, a number of commentators pointed out that he was â€œlittle-knownâ€ and expressed puzzlement that we didnâ€™t seek a â€œbig-name.â€ I wonder how many of them would have known of Lou in 1979, Ajit in 1985, or, for that matter, Charlie in 1959. Our goal was to find a 2-year-old Secretariat, not a 10-year-old Seabiscuit. (Whoops â€“ that may not be the smartest metaphor for an 80-year-old CEO to use.) (pg 19)
On Net Income and why it is useless to measure the health of a company:
Earlier in this letter, I pointed out some numbers that Charlie and I find useful in valuing Berkshire and measuring its progress.Letâ€™s focus here on a number we omitted, but which many in the media feature above all others: net income. Important though that number may be at most companies, it is almost always meaningless at Berkshire. Regardless of how our businesses might be doing, Charlie and I could â€“ quite legally â€“ cause net income in any given period to be almost any number we would like.
We have that flexibility because realized gains or losses on investments go into the net income figure, whereas unrealized gains (and, in most cases, losses) are excluded.
…Charlie and I have never sold a security because of the effect a sale would have on the net income we were soon to report. We both have a deep disgust for â€œgame playingâ€ with numbers, a practice that was rampant throughout corporate Americain the 1990s and still persists, though it occurs less frequently and less blatantly than it used to. (pg 21)
On real valuations and being unable to pinpoint a number:
Our inability to pinpoint a number doesnâ€™t bother us: We would rather be approximately right than precisely wrong.
John Kenneth Galbraith once slyly observed that economists were most economical with ideas: They made the ones learned in graduate school last a lifetime. University finance departments often behave similarly.Witness the tenacity with which almost all clung to the theory of efficient markets throughout the 1970s and 1980s, dismissively calling powerful facts that refuted it â€œanomalies.â€ (I always love explanations of that kind:The Flat Earth Society probably views a shipâ€™s circling of the globe as an annoying, but inconsequential,anomaly.) (pg 21)
On the social responsibility of conservative financial practices (no leverage) and keeping cash on hand:
Charlie and I have no interest in any activity that could pose the slightest threat to Berkshireâ€™s well being. (With our having a combined age of 167, starting over is not on our bucket list.) We are forever conscious of the fact that you, our partners, have entrusted us with what in many cases is a major portion of your savings. In addition, important philanthropy is dependent on our prudence. Finally, many disabled victims of accidents caused by our insureds are counting on us to deliver sums payable decades from now. It would be irresponsible for us to risk what all these constituencies need just to pursue a few points of extra return.
On NOT paying dividends and instead reinvesting. Always a growth stock in a way:
Furthermore, not a dime of cash has left Berkshire for dividends or share repurchases during the past 40 years. Instead, we have retained all of our earnings to strengthen our business, a reinforcement now running about $1 billion per month. Our net worth has thus increased from $48 million to $157 billion during those four decades and our intrinsic value has grown far more. No other American corporation has come close to building up its financial strength in this unrelenting way.
By being so cautious in respect to leverage, we penalize our returns by a minor amount. Having loads of liquidity, though, lets us sleep well. Moreover, during the episodes of financial chaos that occasionally erupt in oureconomy, we will be equipped both financially and emotionally to play offense while others scramble for survival. Thatâ€™s what allowed us to invest $15.6 billion in 25 days of panic following the Lehman bankruptcy in 2008 (pg 24)
And towards the end of the letter he does what a good business man should. HE ASKS FOR YOUR BUSINESS!
The best reason to exit, of course, is to shop. We will help you do that by filling the 194,300-squarefoot hall that adjoins the meeting area with products from dozens of Berkshire subsidiaries. Last year, you did your part, and most locations racked up record sales. In a nine-hour period, we sold 1,053 pairs of Justin boots, 12,416 pounds of Seeâ€™s candy, 8,000 Dairy Queen BlizzardsÂ® and 8,800 Quikut knives (thatâ€™s 16 knives perminute). But you can do better. Remember: Anyone who says money canâ€™t buy happiness simply hasnâ€™t learned where to shop.
GEICO will have a booth staffed by a number of its top counselors from around the country, all ofthem ready to supply you with auto insurance quotes. [etc...] (pg 24)
If I have quoted it above. Particularly if it is bold. It is an opinion I agree with. I think the man speaks the truth.