A question I recently heard was "Where is the Internet going?" My two cents? At least
for communicators I believe it is going towards two major themes.
- First LISTEN and then;
- distribute authoring to the people.
Let’s talk about what the Internet is not. It is not currently a true conversation. Oh I know all about the manifesto
and have said myself numerous times that it is "conversational". There
is a conversation going on; yet it it is not equidistant to all people.
Calling the Internet a conversation is similar to saying that everyone participated in Andy Warhol’s factory. Or the original rat pack.
Some participated. Some led. Yet for the most part it was voyeurism
pure and simple for the mass majority. Despite the change in mediums we
still see the minority participating in the conversation and the elite
minority leading it. The majority watches from the sidelines.
I am not suggesting the leading minority is subjugating anyone. It is simply that people are shy and stepping up to a global conversation is damn hard.
Continue reading Listen First – then Distribute Your Authoring
From the New Scientist magazine there is an article worth reading. The headline is a bit of an over-the-top tease but the concept is real. It is about a scientist named Roger Shawyer in the UK.
Relativity drive: The end of wings and wheels?
(snip) Key is the fact that the diameter of a tubular cavity alters the path –
and hence the effective velocity – of the microwaves travelling through
The short version is microwaves are shot into a tube. The tube is shaped like a cone with one end smaller than the other. This causes more force to be directed against the large end of the cone than the smaller end. That force difference creates propulsion which can be used for space craft. If it works….
Visual of the relativity drive here.
The only thing people fight about more than energy is God. Increases in efficiency and alternatives are a good thing. Via digg.
On Citizendium, Larry Sanger and Clay Shirky.
As a long time reader of Corante I can say that, truthfully, half the time I don’t get it. Well I might "get it" if I understood it. They use lots of big words. Ontological. Stuff like that.
Yet Clay is one brilliant guy. And when speaking he does seem to simplify to the point of understanding. I like his belief in folksonomy. I wish he wrote like he spoke. Be clear.
Larry? Passionate? Yes. And a far greater success in the online world that my current ventures so I tip my hat to the man. Yet again I am not sure I follow his thoughts on the subject. And I believe communication is first a burden on the communicator.
My take on all of this is simply that we need both a House and a Senate in Congress, similarly we need both a Wikipedia and a Citizendium in knowledge management. The thinkers and the populace should both get a vote. The answer is somewhere in the middle.
Continue reading Citizendium and Wikipedia – The Path I want is a Balance of Power
I have been studying video formats and standards lately (yes, part of my job). I like knowing the standards. We all do. Example:
Q: "I want a portable music player. What should I buy?"
That simple. That is what positioning and branding is about. So, to break down the specifics:
Q: "I want the best HD system available. What should I buy?"
A: "1080 Progressive Scan."
OK, the second example doesn’t have a brand name. But just knowing that 1080p is the "one", that is helpful to me. Same for the folks at the xBox 360 who now support 1080p. Yea!
Citizendium aspires to have a group of intellectuals create moderated great ideas. Like foo camp has an invited group of intellectuals.
Wikipedia aspires to have editors from the willing and takes all comers. Like bar camp has unconferences of the willing.
Citizendium is being started by Larry Sanger, one of the cofounders of wikipedia. It is like wikipedia but with peer review. From the citizendium essay.
Imagine what is
possible with tens of millions of intellectuals working together on educational
and reference projects.
The wrench in the whole thing is that wikipedia started as a dot com called nupedia with experts and peer review (sanger) . So wikipedia started where citizendium is trying to restart. From Larry Sanger, the cofounder of wikipedia, on slashdot.
Wikipedia’s predecessor, which I was also employed to organize, was
Nupedia. Nupedia was to be a highly reliable, peer-reviewed resource
that fully appreciated and employed the efforts of subject area
experts, as well as the general public.
Is this getting recursive to anyone else?
Continue reading Citizendium is to Foo as Wikipedia is to Bar
Via this post on brand autopsy, I just discovered The Laws of Simplicty blog by John Maeda.
- Law 1 – the simplest way to achieve simplicity is through thoughtful reduction
I think this is going to be a good book…
The crew from Tuesday night. Great conversations. Killed a few beers. Saved the world. OK, I made that last part up…
I tried to explain that last post on the PR Disaster forming for Target (TGT) about refusing to make their site accessible. I had difficulty because had to use geek speak. So in an effort to explain in English I ran some accessibility tests on the target site. It is not all bad news, just mostly bad news for target.
The way a screen reader works is it converts a web site to text and then reads it out loud to the person. So this first image (below) was created with the Fangs emulator and shows the words that would be read out loud. (Note – Fangs is not a screen reader, it is a free emulator used by developers). Anyway, see all of those "Link" and "Bullet" words? Those are links that are images that do not have ALT tags. That is bad. And it is easy to fix. Would you want to have a computer say "link bullet link bullet link bullet" to you over and over? Of course not.
Continue reading Target’s Accessibility – Not All Bad, Just Mostly Bad
OK, who handles PR for Target? This public relations train wreck was linked to me by Tim and Jason both after some discussion at Netsquared last night.
Blind Advocate’s Suit Against Target Allowed to Proceed
Group Seeks Right to Sue Retailers Over Website Accessibility
By Mya Frazier
COLUMBUS, Ohio (AdAge.com) — Retailers may soon need to ensure their virtual stores are as accessible to the blind as their physical stores are to wheelchair users.
A lawsuit against Target Stores making its way through a federal court in California has laid the groundwork that gives the blind the right to sue a retailer if its website is not accessible.
this quote from the article says it best
"We felt we had no choice but to bring this lawsuit," Mr. ParÃ© said.
"They argued the law doesn’t say they have to, but that has nothing to
do with whether they should. Target had billions in profits last year.
They can afford to do this."
For those readers who aren’t technical let me be clear. What Target is
being asked to do is 1) easy and 2) reasonable from a technical
perspective. ALT tags? They are going to the mat against the blind over
ALT tags? Please.
Sharon Rush of Knowbility is our speaker for Netsquared Houston tomorrow night.
Houston NetSquared Meetup
Web 2.0 Sucks! (Unless it’s accessible) Sharron Rush of Knowbility comes to chat
Sharron Rush Executive Director
Tue 12-Sep-06 7:00 PM to Tue 12-Sep-06 9:30 PM
- Program Description: (a.k.a. the "sales pitch" but it is FREE and for Non Profits so here goes.)
At this month’s Houston NetSquared meetup we’ll be talking with
Sharron Rush about the technology community’s role in making Web sites
accessible and barrier free.
As Executive Director of Knowbility (http://www.knowbility.org
), Sharron is constantly working on new and innovative solutions to
transform Internet technologies to be more accessible to the community
at large – including the elderly, the disabled and everyone else!
Web sites and online technology is good for everyone. Knowbility is a
wonderful online accessibility promoter and supporter, with events like
the Accessibility Internet Rally (AIR) – http://www.knowbility.org/a… – and fantastic accessibility training.
this Houston NetSquared meeting, we’ll be giving away a copy of
Sharron’s book ‘Maximum Accessibility – Making Your Web Site More
Usable for Everyone’ (check it out online here: http://www.amazon.com/gp/pr… ).
miss this great conversation about making the web an accessible place
for all. What are you doing to make the Internet barrier free? What
questions do you or your organization have about building an accessible
Web site? Join us!
Continue reading Web 2.0 Sucks! (Unless it’s accessible) – Sharon Rush Speaking tomorrow